Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Con: Conducting research on stem cells is unethical

Argument Points:

  • Using stem cells to clone for necessary genes is both immoral and possibly detrimental to the recipient of a transplant

  • Immoral:
  • The act of altering humans goes against God because God made us in his image
  • Hubris: We should not mess with human life and humans should not be trying to play God
  • The process of extracting the stem cells kills the embryo:
  • The ethical issues of scientific work on aborted fetuses did not justify the possible benefits
  • "Use of embryonic stem cells for reasearch involves the destruction of blastocysts formed from laboratory-fertilized human eggs. For those who believe that life begins at conception, the blastocyst is a human life and to destroy it is unacceptable" (Pros and Cons of Stem Cell Research by Theresa Phillips, About.com Guide http://biotech.about.com/od/bioethics/i/issuestemcells_2.htm)
  • An embryo is a person, albeit a person at a very early stage of development, but a person none the less
  • "Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical" Experiment Resources (2008). Stem Cell Research - Pros and Cons. Retrieved February 22,2010 from Experiment Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/stem-cell-pros-and-cons.html
  • Same as murder

  • Detrimental to the recipient:
  • "Some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research" Experiment Resources (2008). Stem Cell Research - Pros and Cons. Retrieved February 22, 2010 from Experiment Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/stem-cell-pros-and-cons.html
  • Too much value has been placed on stem cells because scientists are not actually know fore sure that stem cells can be used to clone organs to be transplanted (to oneself)
  • Some painful destruction of the bone marrow results from this procedure
  • "Mice treated for Parkinson's with embryonic stem cells have died from brain tumors in as much as 20% of cases" (The Real Promise of Stem Cell Research Dr. David Prentice, HealthNewsDigest.com)
  • "Embryonic stem cells stored over time have been shown to create the type of chromosomal anomalies that create cancer cells" (Derivation of Human Stem-Cell Lines from Human Blastocysts, C. A. Cowan and others. March 25, 2004, New England Journal of Medicine, p.1355 with secondary reference to footnotes 13-17 p.1356.)
  • The genetic difference between other individuals stem cells could result in complications when transplanting them, such as the body might reject them causing the transplant to fail

  • Other Cons:
  • Limited supply
  • Short life span
  • The cells may carry mutations for diseases or could be useless

Sources:

  1. Experiment Resources (2008). Stem Cell Research - Pros and Cons. Retrieved February 22, 2010 from Experiment Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/stem-cell-pros-and-cons.html
  2. Popular Issues: Pros and Cons of Stem Research http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/pros-and-cons-of-stem-cell-research.htm
  3. Pros and Cons of Stem Cell Research by Theresa Phillips, About.com Guide http://biotech.about.com/od/bioethics/i/issuestemcells_2.htm
  4. Actionbioscience.org: Stem Cells for Cell-Based Therapies by Dr. Lauren Pecorino http://actionbioscience.org/biotech/pecorino2.html
  5. Biology Book, Page 253, Technology & Society: Stem Cells: Promises and Problems


5 comments:

  1. Hey Ian I really liked your blog layout and liked how your main posts all sort of followed together, which makes your argument stronger. Also I would recommend going further into your arguments and maybe relate it back to a person you know or have read about.

    I disagree with you, however, when it comes to stem cell research. I believe that scientists should continue this research because down the road it could save millions of lives. I think it will be interesting to see what points you oppent makes and I am wondering if you will change you mind after hearing the other side of the argument.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your blog is great!
    I really like how you cited all of your sources at the end of the argument, and how your points were clearly defined. I think you have a compelling and solid argument; I look forward to reading your debate reflection!

    Oh, and I also liked your use of 'hubris'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well done, Ian. Well done. I'm not sure whether I'm supposed to comment on th eblog or on your argument, so I'll do both. You had good examples that really convinced me to be anti-"baby killer". The Greek mythology reference helped me understand your standpoint on God's role in this controversy, as I am not a Christian. Your blog, on the other hand, is easy to read and user-friendly. Overall a good job. Yay, Ian.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really liked your points under the Immoral topic. It really displayed my thoughts on Stem Cell Research, that we shouldn't take a life to save another life. Very good!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whoa Ian. That is a lot of information on one blog. And you got the same background as me. I don't like it but the rest of your blog is good.

    ReplyDelete